Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://idr.iimranchi.ac.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/1492
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBhatia, Prince.-
dc.contributor.authorChakrabarti, Prasenjit.-
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-02T01:46:21Z-
dc.date.available2023-01-02T01:46:21Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.citationPrince Bhatia and Prasenjit Chakrabarti (2022). Does group affiliation impact financial constraints? Evidence from India. Managerial Finance, 48(6), 917-938. https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-08-2021-0392en_US
dc.identifier.issn0307-4358-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1108/MF-08-2021-0392-
dc.identifier.urihttp://idr.iimranchi.ac.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/1492-
dc.description.abstractPurpose – This study aims to primarily investigate two vital questions: First, the authors examine whether group-affiliated firms are more (less) financially constrained vis- a-vis standalone firms. The authors estimate working capital investment (WCI) to cash flow sensitivity to understand the nature of financial constraints. Second, the authors further investigate the impact of working capital level on firm values and risks between group-affiliated and standalone firms. Design/methodology/approach – This paper uses balanced panel data set from the year 2012–2019. The authors employ propensity score matching to ascertain comparable firm attributes from business group and standalone firms. This process yields 280 firms (140 in each group) after controlling the firm heterogeneity between these two groups. All the models are estimated using fixed-effect regression. Findings – The authors find that group affiliated firms are less financially constrained than standalone firms. The results show that WCI to cash flow sensitivity is higher in standalone firms vis-a-vis group-affiliated firms, implying that standalone firms are more financially constrained than group-affiliated firms. Second, the authors find that firm values are more sensitive to working capital level in standalone firms versus groupaffiliated firms. Furthermore, the authors document that the risk of the standalone firms is less sensitive to working capital level than that of group-affiliated firms. Originality/value – Most recent studies exploring the role of group affiliation in financing constraints have not controlled for heterogeneity among group-affiliated firms vis- a-vis standalone firms, which may arise due to variation in firm characteristics. Unlike prior studies, this research design ascertains comparable firm attributes between business group and standalone firms, implying firms belonging to these two groups differ by the exogeneous affiliation (business group and standalone firms). The authors document that groupaffiliated firms are less financially constrained than standalone firms controlling firm-level heterogeneity between group-affiliated and standalone firms. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, no such work has been previously done in general (specifically in India).en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherManagerial Financeen_US
dc.subjectFinancial constraintsen_US
dc.subjectBusiness groupsen_US
dc.subjectAffiliated firmsen_US
dc.subjectWorking capital investmenten_US
dc.subjectCash flow sensitivityen_US
dc.subjectFirm valueen_US
dc.subjectIIM Ranchien_US
dc.titleDoes group affiliation impact financial constraints? Evidence from Indiaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.volume48en_US
dc.issue6en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.