Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://idr.iimranchi.ac.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/301
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKumar, Rajiv.-
dc.contributor.authorSachan, Amit.-
dc.contributor.authorMukherjee, Arindam.-
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-22T10:10:00Z-
dc.date.available2018-06-22T10:10:00Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationKumar, R., Sachan, A., & Mukherjee, A. (2018). Direct vs indirect e-government adoption: an exploratory study. Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance, 20(2), 149-162.en_US
dc.identifier.issn23985038-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1108/DPRG-07-2017-0040-
dc.identifier.urihttp://10.10.16.56:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/301-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The purpose of this study is to investigate the factors that influence direct and indirect adoption of e-government services in India. Design/methodology/approach: A conceptual model has been proposed by integrating the factors influencing adoption of e-government services from extant literature. A quantitative technique is used for the purpose of the study. Findings: The study classifies e-government adoption in two types: direct adoption and indirect adoption. The study has found that there is some difference between the factors influencing direct and indirect e-government adoption. Perceived awareness, perceived usefulness, trust in internet, trust in government and social influence are found to be positively correlated to direct and indirect e-government adoption. Availability of resources, computer self-efficacy, perceived ease-of-use, perceived compatibility, multilingual option and voluntariness are positively correlated to direct e-government adoption and negatively correlated to indirect e-government adoption. Perceived image is found to be significant for direct e-government adoption but non-significant for indirect adoption. Trust in intermediary is found to be significant only for indirect e-government adoption. Research limitations/implications: The sample size of 382 may not be a proper representation of a country like India, which has huge diversity and is densely populated. The study has been conducted in India, which is a developing country. The result might not be significant for developed countries. Practical implications: The findings of this study provide useful insights into the decision-making process of e-government users in India and similar emerging economies. These findings can be important for government officials tasked with providing e-governance services. Originality/value: Despite the digital divide, how the government is expecting its citizens to access e-government services and derive benefits and how the needy will be able to cope with the mandatory e-government services is an interesting topic to study. This leads to a new concept of indirect adoption.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherEmerald Publishing Limiteden_US
dc.subjectIndiaen_US
dc.subjectAdoptionen_US
dc.subjectE-governmenten_US
dc.subjectDirect adoptionen_US
dc.subjectIndirect adoptionen_US
dc.subjectIntermediaryen_US
dc.subjectIIM Ranchien_US
dc.titleDirect vs indirect e-government adoption: an exploratory studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.volume20en_US
dc.issue2en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.