Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://idr.iimranchi.ac.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/900
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNandankar, Sunil.-
dc.contributor.authorSachan, Amit.-
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-02T10:21:52Z-
dc.date.available2021-02-02T10:21:52Z-
dc.date.issued2020-12-
dc.identifier.citationNandankar, S., & Sachan, A. (2020). Electronic procurement adoption, usage and performance: a literature review. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management. 11(4), 515-535.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2053-4620-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-02-2020-0031-
dc.identifier.urihttp://idr.iimranchi.ac.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/900-
dc.description.abstractPurpose – Despite the substantial research in the domain of electronic procurement adoption, usage and performance (EP AUP), there is no structured review of these studies and most of the literature is in fragmented form. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to investigate and synthesize EP AUP research in the past two decades and map key research approaches, prevailing theories and antecedents used by researchers to study EP AUP at the individual user and organizational level. Design/methodology/approach – To evaluate and comprehend past and current patterns/themes in the EP AUP research area, a systematic literature review is undertaken. Significant peer-reviewed studies covering three categories – adoption, usage and performance and seven classification criteria are critically reviewed. Findings – The findings reveal that most investigators mainly used “technology acceptance model,” “technology–organization–environment” framework and their extensions, demonstrating that “perceived ease of use,” “perceived usefulness,” “trust,” “organizational size,” “organizational readiness” and “behavioral intentions” are the most critical drivers of EP AUP. Research limitations/implications – For researchers and practitioners, the review highlights a taxonomy of contextual factors to be considered for successful EP AUP. It further makes suggestions for future research meeting challenges of Industry-4.0. Originality/value – To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first systematic literature review undertaken in the field of EP that studies it from three different perspectives. It further builds on the determinants of EP AUP and classifies them in four distinct categories: organizational, individual, information system level and environmental.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherJournal of Science and Technology Policy Managementen_US
dc.subjectElectronic procurement adoptionen_US
dc.subjectE-procurementen_US
dc.subjectTechnology managementen_US
dc.subjectE-marketplaceen_US
dc.subjectLiterature reviewen_US
dc.subjectElectronic procurementen_US
dc.subjectIIM Ranchien_US
dc.titleElectronic procurement adoption, usage and performance: a literature reviewen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.volume11en_US
dc.issue4en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.