Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://idr.iimranchi.ac.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/930
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMarathe, Gaurav Manohar.-
dc.contributor.authorBalasubramanian, Girish.-
dc.contributor.authorChalil, Gloryson.-
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-01T05:24:25Z-
dc.date.available2021-04-01T05:24:25Z-
dc.date.issued2019-10-
dc.identifier.citationMarathe, G. M., Balasubramanian, G., & Chalil, G. (2019). Conceptualising the psychological work states–extending the JD-R model. Management Research Review. 42(10), 1187-1200.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2040-8269-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-03-2017-0077-
dc.identifier.urihttp://idr.iimranchi.ac.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/930-
dc.description.abstractPurpose – The purpose of this paper is to extend the job demands-resources (JD-R) model by including the factor of “personal demands” and conceptualise experience on personal and job dimensions separately as personal thrust and job thrust. Further, different psychological work states that individuals experience through intra-dimensional balance across personal and job dimensions are proposed. Design/methodology/approach – The paper explains various possible psychological work states experienced by a job incumbent by conceptually developing intra-dimensional fluctuations within the person and job dimensions, respectively, as the new concepts of person and job thrust. Findings – Personal thrust and job thrust have been identified as the two dimensions which impact the work state. Complete engagement and complete disengagement have been identified as two ends of a continuum. Complete work engagement is defined as the balance across these two dimensions. Various combinations of balances and imbalances across these two dimensions results in four different states of disengagement identified as work exhaustion, work boredom, work search and work neutrality. Research limitations/implications – This paper suggests a novel approach to using personal demand to look at work states which would significantly impact existing research in the JD-R model. This paper tries to bridge the gap between work engagement as a construct and the psychological work states as a phenomenon. Further, it is contended that the psychological work states are manifestations of the interactions between the two dimensions identified as personal and job thrust, which could further be developed into various work-related attitudes and behaviours. Practical implications – Instead of only relying on the engagement/disengagement dichotomy to plan interventions, managers can plan the appropriate interventions depending on the specific disengagement state analysed through personal and job thrust. Originality/value – The newly developed model of work states explains the fluctuation of an individual across different work states and links the personal and job-related demand–resource balance at the workplace with distal work-related outcomes, thereby significantly extending the JD-R model.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherManagement Research Reviewen_US
dc.subjectHuman resource managementen_US
dc.subjectWork engagementen_US
dc.subjectJob demanden_US
dc.subjectJob resourcesen_US
dc.subjectPersonal resourcesen_US
dc.subjectWork disengagementen_US
dc.subjectJD-R modelen_US
dc.subjectPersonal demanden_US
dc.subjectWork statesen_US
dc.subjectIIM Ranchien_US
dc.titleConceptualising the psychological work states – extending the JD-R modelen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.volume42en_US
dc.issue10en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.