dc.contributor.author |
Kumar, Rajiv. |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Sachan, Amit. |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Mukherjee, Arindam. |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2018-06-22T10:10:00Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2018-06-22T10:10:00Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2018 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
Kumar, R., Sachan, A., & Mukherjee, A. (2018). Direct vs indirect e-government adoption: an exploratory study. Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance, 20(2), 149-162. |
en_US |
dc.identifier.issn |
23985038 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
https://doi.org/10.1108/DPRG-07-2017-0040 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://10.10.16.56:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/301 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to investigate the factors that influence direct and indirect adoption of e-government services in India.
Design/methodology/approach: A conceptual model has been proposed by integrating the factors influencing adoption of e-government services from extant literature. A quantitative technique is used for the purpose of the study.
Findings: The study classifies e-government adoption in two types: direct adoption and indirect adoption. The study has found that there is some difference between the factors influencing direct and indirect e-government adoption. Perceived awareness, perceived usefulness, trust in internet, trust in government and social influence are found to be positively correlated to direct and indirect e-government adoption. Availability of resources, computer self-efficacy, perceived ease-of-use, perceived compatibility, multilingual option and voluntariness are positively correlated to direct e-government adoption and negatively correlated to indirect e-government adoption. Perceived image is found to be significant for direct e-government adoption but non-significant for indirect adoption. Trust in intermediary is found to be significant only for indirect e-government adoption.
Research limitations/implications: The sample size of 382 may not be a proper representation of a country like India, which has huge diversity and is densely populated. The study has been conducted in India, which is a developing country. The result might not be significant for developed countries.
Practical implications: The findings of this study provide useful insights into the decision-making process of e-government users in India and similar emerging economies. These findings can be important for government officials tasked with providing e-governance services.
Originality/value: Despite the digital divide, how the government is expecting its citizens to access e-government services and derive benefits and how the needy will be able to cope with the mandatory e-government services is an interesting topic to study. This leads to a new concept of indirect adoption. |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
en_US |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
Emerald Publishing Limited |
en_US |
dc.subject |
India |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Adoption |
en_US |
dc.subject |
E-government |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Direct adoption |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Indirect adoption |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Intermediary |
en_US |
dc.subject |
IIM Ranchi |
en_US |
dc.title |
Direct vs indirect e-government adoption: an exploratory study |
en_US |
dc.type |
Article |
en_US |
dc.volume |
20 |
en_US |
dc.issue |
2 |
en_US |