DSpace Repository

Electronic procurement adoption, usage and performance: a literature review

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Nandankar, Sunil.
dc.contributor.author Sachan, Amit.
dc.date.accessioned 2021-02-02T10:21:52Z
dc.date.available 2021-02-02T10:21:52Z
dc.date.issued 2020-12
dc.identifier.citation Nandankar, S., & Sachan, A. (2020). Electronic procurement adoption, usage and performance: a literature review. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management. 11(4), 515-535. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 2053-4620
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-02-2020-0031
dc.identifier.uri http://idr.iimranchi.ac.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/900
dc.description.abstract Purpose – Despite the substantial research in the domain of electronic procurement adoption, usage and performance (EP AUP), there is no structured review of these studies and most of the literature is in fragmented form. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to investigate and synthesize EP AUP research in the past two decades and map key research approaches, prevailing theories and antecedents used by researchers to study EP AUP at the individual user and organizational level. Design/methodology/approach – To evaluate and comprehend past and current patterns/themes in the EP AUP research area, a systematic literature review is undertaken. Significant peer-reviewed studies covering three categories – adoption, usage and performance and seven classification criteria are critically reviewed. Findings – The findings reveal that most investigators mainly used “technology acceptance model,” “technology–organization–environment” framework and their extensions, demonstrating that “perceived ease of use,” “perceived usefulness,” “trust,” “organizational size,” “organizational readiness” and “behavioral intentions” are the most critical drivers of EP AUP. Research limitations/implications – For researchers and practitioners, the review highlights a taxonomy of contextual factors to be considered for successful EP AUP. It further makes suggestions for future research meeting challenges of Industry-4.0. Originality/value – To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first systematic literature review undertaken in the field of EP that studies it from three different perspectives. It further builds on the determinants of EP AUP and classifies them in four distinct categories: organizational, individual, information system level and environmental. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management en_US
dc.subject Electronic procurement adoption en_US
dc.subject E-procurement en_US
dc.subject Technology management en_US
dc.subject E-marketplace en_US
dc.subject Literature review en_US
dc.subject Electronic procurement en_US
dc.subject IIM Ranchi en_US
dc.title Electronic procurement adoption, usage and performance: a literature review en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.volume 11 en_US
dc.issue 4 en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record