DSpace Repository

Conceptualising the psychological work states – extending the JD-R model

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Marathe, Gaurav Manohar.
dc.contributor.author Balasubramanian, Girish.
dc.contributor.author Chalil, Gloryson.
dc.date.accessioned 2021-04-01T05:24:25Z
dc.date.available 2021-04-01T05:24:25Z
dc.date.issued 2019-10
dc.identifier.citation Marathe, G. M., Balasubramanian, G., & Chalil, G. (2019). Conceptualising the psychological work states–extending the JD-R model. Management Research Review. 42(10), 1187-1200. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 2040-8269
dc.identifier.uri https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-03-2017-0077
dc.identifier.uri http://idr.iimranchi.ac.in:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/930
dc.description.abstract Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to extend the job demands-resources (JD-R) model by including the factor of “personal demands” and conceptualise experience on personal and job dimensions separately as personal thrust and job thrust. Further, different psychological work states that individuals experience through intra-dimensional balance across personal and job dimensions are proposed. Design/methodology/approach – The paper explains various possible psychological work states experienced by a job incumbent by conceptually developing intra-dimensional fluctuations within the person and job dimensions, respectively, as the new concepts of person and job thrust. Findings – Personal thrust and job thrust have been identified as the two dimensions which impact the work state. Complete engagement and complete disengagement have been identified as two ends of a continuum. Complete work engagement is defined as the balance across these two dimensions. Various combinations of balances and imbalances across these two dimensions results in four different states of disengagement identified as work exhaustion, work boredom, work search and work neutrality. Research limitations/implications – This paper suggests a novel approach to using personal demand to look at work states which would significantly impact existing research in the JD-R model. This paper tries to bridge the gap between work engagement as a construct and the psychological work states as a phenomenon. Further, it is contended that the psychological work states are manifestations of the interactions between the two dimensions identified as personal and job thrust, which could further be developed into various work-related attitudes and behaviours. Practical implications – Instead of only relying on the engagement/disengagement dichotomy to plan interventions, managers can plan the appropriate interventions depending on the specific disengagement state analysed through personal and job thrust. Originality/value – The newly developed model of work states explains the fluctuation of an individual across different work states and links the personal and job-related demand–resource balance at the workplace with distal work-related outcomes, thereby significantly extending the JD-R model. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Management Research Review en_US
dc.subject Human resource management en_US
dc.subject Work engagement en_US
dc.subject Job demand en_US
dc.subject Job resources en_US
dc.subject Personal resources en_US
dc.subject Work disengagement en_US
dc.subject JD-R model en_US
dc.subject Personal demand en_US
dc.subject Work states en_US
dc.subject IIM Ranchi en_US
dc.title Conceptualising the psychological work states – extending the JD-R model en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.volume 42 en_US
dc.issue 10 en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record